Comparison of Roman and Greek Architecture

Comparison of papistical and Greek Architecture Architecture has been a fundamental frequency cornerstone for building societies passim the entire valet de chambre development. Architecture in general is unendingly changing besides the ideas that have been formulated tend to write out back and regularise the next. They range those who eat up history ar doomed to fictionalize it and we can see how we are constantly repeating ourselves in terms of architecture. I shall compare and contrast the Greek and papist ideal styles of architecture, by breaking shine both of their discoveries and similarities.Greek architecture has several qualities that assure its work as a fundamental cornerstone in architecture. The Greeks had introduced several kindle factors the scale of building was now proportioned to that of the human body. Greek architecture had a apparently positive outlook on things, distant its predecessors like the Egyptians which brought out the death in architectur e. Greek architecture was considered the celebration of life. The virtually prestigious architectural achievement commit forth by the Greek parenthood was the Parthenon, a temple dedicated to Athena.According to The humane Tradition, written by Gloria K. Fiero, the Parthenon represented the vertex of a long history of post-and-lintel temple building among the Greeks. The Greeks had introduced three of the five grassroots columns in classical architecture which are the doric, Ionic, and Corinthian columns. Opposed to the Greeks, the papisticals had never created their aver columns rather re-invited the one the Greeks had made, rendering them dissimilar in comparison. The roman prints had created the papistic Doric columns and the Roman Tuscan columns. some(prenominal) of which are enhanced version of the Greeks Doric column.Like most of Romes architectural achievements, their work was merely a version of past works. Another prime exercise which was taken from the Etrusc ans was the Arch, which was fortified by the Romans and in term led to the Barrel omit check to the Britannica Online Encyclopedia, it is a ceiling consisting of a series of semi-cylindrical arches. Many may say that the works of the Romans were un-original just now to the contrary, they had brought forth the use of concrete, walked us through to the introduction of 50,000 miles of itinerary and provided us with fresh flowing body of water from the aqueducts they had constructed.The beacon of Roman architecture is the Pantheon, according to The Humanistic Tradition, is Roman technical dexterity and dramatic spatial design. Architecture in general is constantly changing but the ideas that have been formulated tend to drive back and influence the next. Through the comparisons of these devil major architectural influences we see that my surmise of expansion in architecture is in fact true.Through the comparison of Greek and Roman discoveries and similarities we notice the lin k between fit to change in architecture and the influence one civilization has on the other. thrash Cited -Fiero, Gloria k. The Humanistic Tradition, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2006 put vault. Encyclop? dia Britannica. 2010. Encyclop? dia Britannica Online. 07 Dec. 2010 The Five Basic Greek and Roman Columns and Arches. Essortment Articles Free Online Articles on Health, Science, Education & More.. 2002. Web. 07 Dec. 2010.